February 18, 2006
Religious Bigetry and Self Censorship in the Media
Nothing like a little self censorship to spread freedom and democracy:
As the only syndicated political cartoonist who also writes a syndicated column, my living depends on freedom of the press. I can't decide who's a bigger threat: the deluded Islamists who hope to impose Sharia law on Western democracies, or the right-wing clash-of-civilization crusaders waving the banner of "free speech"--the same folks who call for the censorship and even murder of anti-Bush cartoonists here--as an excuse to join the post-9/11 Muslims-suck media pile-on. Most reasonable people reject both--but neither is as dangerous to liberty as America's self-censoring newspaper editors and broadcast producers.The nanny media, even more prudish since 9/11, covers our millions of eyes to protect us from our own icky deeds. In Afghanistan in 2001, while covering a war that had officially killed 12 civilians, I watched a colleague from a major television network collate footage of a B-52 bombing indiscriminately obliterating a civilian neighborhood. "If people saw what bombing looks like here on the ground," he observed as body parts and burning houses and screaming children filled the screen, "they would demand an end to it. Which is why this will never air on American television."
So yeah, maybe censorship is a big deal. Maybe the US only cares about what is going on elsewhere so much to push focus away from the shit that is going on here.
thanks to Peter
Posted at February 18, 2006 9:21 PMCensorship sucks. It should be banned forever. The fact that we cannot express ourselves is rediculous when in our constitution clearly states that we have freedom of speech. DOWN WITH GEORGE W. BUSH
