September 3, 2006

The IMF

The Washington Post recently offered an advertorial for the IMF, which helps tell you how to think about the IMF

The IMF is not out of the woods: In the absence of crises it is lending less, which puts a strain on its budget. But the IMF is worth preserving, even if perhaps in a new form. The world has few competent global institutions that can help manage global problems, and it would be careless to lose one of them.

Does the International Monetary Fund actually make worldwide economic markets more stable? The Wikipedia article on the IMF is doubtful:
Overall the IMF success record is limited. While it was created to help stabilize the global economy, since 1980 over 100 countries have experienced a banking collapse that reduced GDP by four percent or more, far more than at any previous time in history.

In How the IMF Sank Argentina we get a view of the IMF that reminds us why it still exists

AS Argentina's government was resigning in the face of full-scale riots and protests from every sector of society, a BBC-TV reporter asked me whether this economic and political meltdown would change the way people saw the International Monetary Fund. I wanted to say yes, but I had to tell him: "It really depends on how the media reports it."

So far it looks as if the IMF is getting off easy, again. The Fund and the World Bank -- the world's two most powerful financial institutions -- learned an important lesson from their brief spate of bad publicity during the Asian economic crisis a few years ago. They have become masters of the art of "spinning" the news.


Even when there is no news or controvercy, they are still busy spinning away, reminding the world of how important they are and why we need them.

As one learns more about investment, publishing, and business models; while also increasing their own exposure, it gets quite hard to trust much of the media.

Posted at September 3, 2006 12:54 PM
Comments
Post a comment












Search


Archives
August 2016
September 2009
April 2009
November 2008
June 2008
May 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
Recent Entries
What Can You Change?
Radiohead's Harry Patch (In Memory of ) Lyrics
Army Men: Soldiers of Misfortune Sabotage the Water Tower
Black & White Card Dealer
Fishing With Cookies!!!
Big Rapper at a Jewelry Shop
Which Bowling Ball Are You?
Materialism is Hot
The New York Times Further Undermines My Trust in the Media
The Jury
Categories
Aaron (269)
art (1)
brain (17)
business (43)
communication (2)
economics (28)
Food & Drugs (83)
friends (6)
funny (11)
humanity (12)
Internet (60)
Literature (15)
Marketing (115)
Mikey (3)
Military (30)
movies (3)
Music (12)
my logos (7)
Peanut Butter (5)
poems (102)
Politics (206)
poor form (10)
video games (1)
Movies Worth Watching
The Corporation
Cosmos
Manufacturing Consent
McDonalds Movie
Meeting People is Easy
The Money Masters
Tom Delay Movie
Wal Mart Movie

Friends
Brad Talmir
Gift Cardster
HIV Blog
John Scott
JOHO
Lawrence Lessig
Steven Berlin Johnson
Seth Godin's Blog
Smart Mobs
Talking Points Memo
The Memory Hole
This Modern World
Webkinz World
Werty

Help Fight Wars
Support Our Troops

Syndicate this site (XML) © 2003 - 2013
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.